Months after the fact, Gene Steinberg Replies
Make sure you read this post and all the comments for the history behind it, but Gene Steinberg replied today to a post I made over a month ago about how he was clearly not reading my original Apple Matters article by claiming that I clearly wasn’t reading his article. What was really funny is that he takes issue that I hid my rebuttal on my “personal blog.” Here’s part of my reply:
Man, you really can’t read yourself well then can you? Your critique is filled with points that talk about me rather than the issues I raised in my original article. Actually, you call every point that I make in the Apple Matters piece into question by saying things like “I don’t know if Sample, who considers himself a Mac guru, did that, since it’s not mentioned in the article.” Now, considering that I am a Mac guru, wouldn’t you assume that I did? I mean, that’s not arguing my article, that’s making assumptions about me that imply that I am misrepresenting myself.
Oh, and Gene, if you ever get around to finding this reply, I’d like you to explain the difference between my well-trafficked personal blog and your website where you concealed your original critique of my Apple Matters piece without a heads-up (and just in case you’re not following, that’s what you accuse me of doing in your comment, even though it doesn’t make any sense).
Update: I closed comments on this, because I can, and I’m sick of hearing it.
![[Valid RSS]](/images/valid-rss.png "Validate my RSS feed")
Add New Comment
Thanks. Your comment is awaiting approval by a moderator.
Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.
Add New Comment
Trackbacks
(Trackback URL)
7/31/2005 at 12:14 pm
[...] See here and here for the history on this. [...]